Looking for a reliable and effective chargeback service to help you recover your funds? Whatever you do, avoid the subject of our Lamina Litigation review. This company is no different from the scammers who have already taken your money. They may promise you a lot — from a comprehensive analysis of the companies you’ve dealt with to representing your interests in court. However, instead of professional services, you’ll end up dealing with yet another scammer who will only increase your losses. Still skeptical? Read on to learn more.
Key Features
- Company Name: Lamina Litigation
- Website: https://laminalitigation.org/
- Available Contacts: [email protected]
- Foundation: 2023
- Services: Chargeback
- License: None
- Initial Deposit: Not specified
From Sign-Up to Payout
The owners of Lamina Litigation go to great lengths to appear as a legitimate company offering a wide range of services for those looking to recover lost money or proactively safeguard their funds. However, the content of their official website paints a completely different picture. For instance:
- A firm boasting a team of professional lawyers should know the importance of properly drafted legal documents. Yet, their official website lacks even the most basic ones. Not only is there no user agreement, but they didn’t even bother to publish a Privacy Policy. Are these so-called “professional lawyers” unaware of current data protection laws?
- The service’s contact options are limited to a feedback form, an email address, and a postal address for an office in London. There are no phone numbers, no online chat, and no links to social media profiles. It’s suspicious for a supposedly reputable company to lack even a phone number. As for social media presence, real companies use these platforms to engage with their audience, while virtual-only firms don’t see it as necessary. Skipping this step also saves resources.
- The website’s creators provide false information and then manage to debunk their own claims. For example, the homepage boasts about three years of industry experience, while the “About” page claims five years. Whether it’s three or five years, the firm refers to itself as an “Award-Winning Financial Recovery Specialist.” Of course, no specific details about these awards are provided — not due to modesty but because they don’t exist.
- The “About” page introduces us to their team, but this introduction is far from credible. For example, the photo of Monica Black, their Chief Communication Officer, is actually from an eyewear advertisement. Peter Perish, listed as Chief Business Project, supposedly works in at least a dozen other companies under various names. A deeper investigation into other photos would likely reveal that they were sourced from stock image sites, making the entire team a figment of the developers’ imagination.
The Lamina Litigation website is riddled with inconsistencies and errors. This suggests it was hastily thrown together, with glaring incompetence from everyone involved. It’s highly doubtful that a team incapable of creating a coherent website could develop effective technologies for chargebacks, counterparty analysis, risk management, etc. In reality, this is yet another scam operation preying on victims of other fraudulent schemes.
Our Impression Of Lamina Litigation
In short, our initial encounter with this chargeback service was utterly disappointing. But the biggest letdown came when we tried to learn about the terms of collaboration. It turns out Lamina Litigation doesn’t even mention:
- The documents required to begin investigations and initiate the process of recovering stolen funds.
- Any approximate timelines for completing the investigation or making a reasoned decision to decline a case.
- An official list of companies or financial organizations they partner with during the recovery process (e.g., banks where Lamina Litigation is accredited or payment systems with formal agreements).
- Initial costs for their services or the commission they deduct from recovered funds upon a successful resolution.
Representatives of Lamina Litigation might argue that such details are confidential or part of their trade secrets. They may claim potential clients will only receive specific information during personal consultations. However, such claims only confirm that this is another scam operation. Legitimate chargeback services operate transparently and provide detailed information to allow clients to make informed comparisons with other providers. After completing 130 or 215 (another statistical discrepancy between their homepage and the “About” page) projects, a genuine firm should be able to calculate average metrics and articulate general principles and requirements.
It’s hard to avoid the conclusion that Lamina Litigation is neither a legal nor a successful chargeback service. It’s far more likely that they have no real knowledge of the procedures or conditions necessary to recover funds stolen by scammers. Their statements are designed to exploit people who have already suffered significant financial losses in various fraudulent schemes. In their desperation, these individuals may act irrationally, accepting help without thoroughly investigating the source. As a result, scammers like Lamina Litigation deceitfully acquire even more money, leaving their victims to suffer additional financial harm.
The Reality Check
Lamina Litigation provides statistics that are supposed to convince potential clients of the company’s effectiveness. However, as we have already mentioned, firstly, the same metrics show different values on different pages. Secondly, we couldn’t find a single piece of evidence to back these claims. For example, the firm could have shared information about which scam projects it managed to recover funds from. We would have appreciated seeing payment documents confirming that a user first transferred money to scammers and later received it back in their account. Many legitimate chargeback services operate this way.
That said, we have doubts about whether we’re dealing with a real platform at all. Fortunately, verifying this isn’t difficult. The website’s footer and contact page list a London office address, and the UK Companies House database is publicly accessible.
A search for the company name returned a single result. The company LAMINA LITIGATION SERVICES LIMITED was registered in 2016 and has received multiple warnings about being struck off the register for failing to pay fees. The latest such procedure was suspended (not canceled) in November 2024. At that time, fees had been unpaid for 665 days, and the last financial report was submitted back in 2021.
The company’s primary activity is listed as Patent and Copyright Agents (SIC 69109). For some reason, this doesn’t seem like a chargeback service to us. The search for the address listed on the website yielded interesting results as well. The location hosts the offices of 62 companies, but Lamina Litigation isn’t one of them.
What conclusions can we draw? The service turns out to be virtual, operating without a registered legal entity and existing solely online. Naturally, any claims about bank accreditations are out of the question, and without these, the chargeback process becomes significantly more complicated. Meanwhile, the name of a real British company is being used, but the cover story doesn’t hold up under scrutiny. As we’ve already mentioned, providing false information is considered normal by the owners of this service. Just think of the fake statistics and team members we discussed earlier, who only exist on the website.
Can you trust such a “company” that deceives clients by presenting fake information about itself? From our perspective, the answer is obvious.
How Long Has Lamina Litigation Been in the Game?
We’ve already mentioned that the service’s official website contains information about how long it has been operating. However, those who published the statistics aren’t sure themselves whether it’s been 3 years or 5. If we look at the registration details of the company whose name is being used, we’ll find that it’s actually 8 years old.
It won’t take much effort to verify these numbers, especially since the pseudo-company, which only exists as a website, has a single verifiable date in its history — the moment its domain was registered. This information is easily accessible through a WHOIS lookup.
According to WHOIS data, the domain laminalitigation.org was registered in August 2023. However, we believe the actual launch date of this fake company is closer to the date of its last major update in July 2024. This conclusion is supported by a lack of activity, so much so that the web archive hasn’t captured a single snapshot of the site. Additionally, there are almost no online reviews about the company or its operations, although the project’s creators have managed to write a few themselves on their own pages.
In any case, whether it’s 15 or 4 months doesn’t make much of a difference to us. Both dates show that the claims about the company’s longevity are also false. Is there even a single truthful statement on Lamina Litigation’s official website? What were the owners of this scam project hoping for when they published fake data that is so easy to verify?
Extra Fraud Indicators
We are no longer in doubt that Lamina Litigation is a project created by scammers with the goal of stealing money from those who have already been victims of fraud. We have provided enough evidence to support this, some of which show that virtually all the information about the company and its activities on the official website is false.
Another fact that strengthens our position is the complete absence of reviews online. After 3 or 5 years, among hundreds of satisfied clients, at least one would have emerged, ready to share their great experience with the service. However, virtually no one online knows about this company or its success in recovering funds for scam victims.
Instead, there are a couple of specialized websites about trading and investing, whose experts have already looked into the pseudo-company and evaluated the materials about it. They pointed out the same problems as we did — the lack of registration and, consequently, accreditation, attempts to mislead users by publishing false information. Naturally, they rate this virtual chargeback service very poorly, calling it a scam and advising against engaging with it.
Is Lamina Litigation the Right Fit?
What conclusions can we draw from the materials presented in our Lamina Litigation review? The main one is that we are dealing not with a real chargeback service but with a company created by scammers. Its main goal is to convince victims of scammers that they will help them recover their funds, only to lure additional sums from them and pocket the money. This is evident from both the operation of the pseudo-company and the lack of official registration, as well as the false information created to deceive users. We warn all our readers — the “specialists” of this fake firm will not help you, and by sending them money, you will only incur more losses.
Lamina Litigation is a scam. I sent them $5,000, and they promised to recover my $73,000 that was stolen by scammers. But they didn’t take any action, I didn’t get my funds back, and I lost the advance. Don’t take the risk!